What ideology prevailing in South Africa? "Free African
Frustrations experienced by Africans in South Africa, starting with the hope that South Africa is a level playing field. After all, South Africa is one of the most liberal constitutions in the world and implies liberal values. But what ideology prevails in South Africa?
Lack of ideology in the night garden that does not exist. Just think liberalism lives according to objective criteria, eternal and universal values conduit. Other mental structures, such as nationalism, communism and even accuse a long list of ideology as if it were an offense. The liberal ideology that sees individuals, other areas, such as the family, the church, in the night garden the nation, the state, the class is simply "service providers" to the free individual. They believe in equal and is elected by strong players, like the British Empire, the United States, or contemporary Africans.
South Africa is a crossroads of irreconcilable ideologies. The South African government created by the liberal imperialism, in contrast with nationalism. In the liberal empire are all equal before the law. Reflects the law in England and English values. Any standards legislation could take (in fact an Englishman) in the "civilized" society in the night garden included. For supporters, it was perfectly fair. While some Africans felt privileged to English can be pursued its own national character, sometimes to the detriment of economic interests and a lot of effort. However, they could themselves in the night garden against
a cultural giant expansion of modern Afrikaners. It is the ideology of nationalism.
For Africans was a national survey self-preservation so obvious that it applies for black South Africans. Separate development was an attempt to sacrifice in the night garden what Africans have done, on a tray to give black people - in the naive hope that blacks claim the rest of the country would not.
More ontstamde blacks, they first turned to liberal ideology. It was the aim, among others, the ANC in the 1940s. Then came a turning point. They saw themselves as the rightful inhabitants of the earth. According to the Freedom Charter of 1955, the country belongs to all who live there, with a redistribution of resources to the majority of the whole place could innneem. Charterisme, as it became known, decades influenced by communism. They always say Africanists against Charterisme Africa belongs to African descendants, European and Asian excluded.
The compromise
of 1994 was a liberal and democratic constitution. With an overwhelming majority Charterists nothing more than liberal democracy necessary. This does not mean Charterists Africanists in the night garden and suddenly became liberals, but simply that they have found a way by which their ideals met.
Africans must realize that none of the three ideologies make room for a separate nation. Afrikaner survive for decades to come, it would be in defiance of the state. Therefore, the Afrikaner's future and freedom are increasingly loosen the South African government.
Reply
It would be interesting to know how many Africans, in the night garden an ideological point of view "margin of separate nation"
want. Of this group, I wonder how many Africans purely race motivated reasons in the night garden to exist separately and how love for their decision to work together and independently to be in the pursuit of self-determination.
Breyten Breytenbach
(of all people!) Express the reality and essential step in the right direction (to freedom) in a perfect item absolutely awesome this report was published in 2009, viz. The rainbow is a broken mirror:
How a man like Breyten dear who can write so well and logical reasoning ever such a transition, from 1994, approved for a fight pens ao?
Although this section Breyten appeared in 2009 and it certainly will not open for comment, a man at least expect that the comments will be considered as part of the package.
July 23, 2012
The democratic revolution is just the first step in the establishment phase of a 3-communist state. Then follow the socialist revolution or economic revolution, the ANC called the "second transition". The third step is the establishment of communism where no private property or freedom (personal, cultural and religious) exists naturally. Democracy is also something for the poor, according to Marxism, and was never designed to include all, but only to a certain group (rich) close. This is what Africans can not or will not understand. in the night garden Without the democratic revolution of 1994, S
Frustrations experienced by Africans in South Africa, starting with the hope that South Africa is a level playing field. After all, South Africa is one of the most liberal constitutions in the world and implies liberal values. But what ideology prevails in South Africa?
Lack of ideology in the night garden that does not exist. Just think liberalism lives according to objective criteria, eternal and universal values conduit. Other mental structures, such as nationalism, communism and even accuse a long list of ideology as if it were an offense. The liberal ideology that sees individuals, other areas, such as the family, the church, in the night garden the nation, the state, the class is simply "service providers" to the free individual. They believe in equal and is elected by strong players, like the British Empire, the United States, or contemporary Africans.
South Africa is a crossroads of irreconcilable ideologies. The South African government created by the liberal imperialism, in contrast with nationalism. In the liberal empire are all equal before the law. Reflects the law in England and English values. Any standards legislation could take (in fact an Englishman) in the "civilized" society in the night garden included. For supporters, it was perfectly fair. While some Africans felt privileged to English can be pursued its own national character, sometimes to the detriment of economic interests and a lot of effort. However, they could themselves in the night garden against
|
For Africans was a national survey self-preservation so obvious that it applies for black South Africans. Separate development was an attempt to sacrifice in the night garden what Africans have done, on a tray to give black people - in the naive hope that blacks claim the rest of the country would not.
More ontstamde blacks, they first turned to liberal ideology. It was the aim, among others, the ANC in the 1940s. Then came a turning point. They saw themselves as the rightful inhabitants of the earth. According to the Freedom Charter of 1955, the country belongs to all who live there, with a redistribution of resources to the majority of the whole place could innneem. Charterisme, as it became known, decades influenced by communism. They always say Africanists against Charterisme Africa belongs to African descendants, European and Asian excluded.
The compromise
|
Africans must realize that none of the three ideologies make room for a separate nation. Afrikaner survive for decades to come, it would be in defiance of the state. Therefore, the Afrikaner's future and freedom are increasingly loosen the South African government.
Reply
It would be interesting to know how many Africans, in the night garden an ideological point of view "margin of separate nation"
|
Breyten Breytenbach
|
How a man like Breyten dear who can write so well and logical reasoning ever such a transition, from 1994, approved for a fight pens ao?
Although this section Breyten appeared in 2009 and it certainly will not open for comment, a man at least expect that the comments will be considered as part of the package.
July 23, 2012
The democratic revolution is just the first step in the establishment phase of a 3-communist state. Then follow the socialist revolution or economic revolution, the ANC called the "second transition". The third step is the establishment of communism where no private property or freedom (personal, cultural and religious) exists naturally. Democracy is also something for the poor, according to Marxism, and was never designed to include all, but only to a certain group (rich) close. This is what Africans can not or will not understand. in the night garden Without the democratic revolution of 1994, S
No comments:
Post a Comment